People for Education Online Community

This morning I was working on a blog entry for the Toronto Development Community Institute. I got on Youtube to search for a piece on Paolo Freire on literacy and oppression. I ended up watching this piece. I think it continues on beautifully with the dialogue Daniel Shirley started yesterday. Take 5 minutes to watch it and let's start talking about what education means to us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgdVCnTTqXA

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Thanks for posting, Deborah! Yes, it relates well to some of the topics/questions we heard at the conference!

Reply to This

Hi Deborah,

I am new to this venue of discourse so forgive me if I am stating nothing new. My background is philosophy (ethics) and political theory. I am unfamiliar with Paolo Freire but now intend to read his book. The issue that stood out for me in the youtube video is the lack of a "political and moral imperative" in our education system. I will restrict my observations to schools in Ontario. Like Henry Gioux in the ‘60’s (in the youtube video), our political leaders seems to lack the ability to justify the need for our society to move in a direction that fosters a greater respect for individual autonomy in our education system.

What is the purpose of our education system: To create workers or to provide the tools to enable our children to become self-sufficient and self-determining (i.e., autonomous)? I support the latter view. But here is the crux of the problem: Our education system is focused on producing workers.

There has been inadequate public debate on the value of individual autonomy and this has led to a dominant utilitarian model of education. It seems to be the norm in our society to associate autonomy with an absolutist view of freedom, which social chaos and anarchy has become associated. And yet, the founding principle of a liberal-democracy is respect for individual autonomy. Within that humanistic notion of autonomy lies the importance of self-knowledge which is achieved by understanding the world in which we interact. This is the view that I support here.

Institutionalized education has helped to eliminate illiteracy but it has failed to succeed at installing a love for learning. We learn not to become a better worker but to become a better person and indirectly we and our society become wealthier for it. There can be a balanced view between utilitarian principles (i.e., support for social programs that produce the greatest good) while maintaining respect for individual autonomy. It doesn’t have to be all or nothing. Respect for individual autonomy does not necessarily endorse as a given an aggregate view of individuals in our society to the extent that it erodes the justification for our social institutions if we employ a principle of justice. The biggest obstacle in a multidisciplinarian approach is that it is often demands more resources. So your question is two-fold: What is the purpose of education and what value do we attach to education? More to the point: What value do we place on being autonomous?

Reply to This

I really like what you have shared here, Anthony. I am going to mull this over some more, and as you have said/suggested, our education system is focused on producing workers. So for now, I would like to put the question "out there", why might the education system be focused on producing workers?

Reply to This

I apologize. I am eager to read other people's contributions but Sheila's question really got me thinking and I wanted to share my thoughts.

I think that Sam’s blog – “the Purpose of Education – Revised” is a valuable contribution to this discussion because he raises the question of what it is that we “need to become”.

But I would like to address Sheila’s Stewart’s question (Why might the education system be focused on producing workers?) here. I think the question is an excellent one because it helps us clarify our answer to the primary question: what is the purpose of education?

At its most basic level, ‘work’, generally speaking, I would define as the act of producing something and in an active sense is the means by which we obtain the things we need to satisfy our bodily requirements for subsistence. We need to work in order to survive. As our society has evolved so has our notion of the type of ‘work’ available but fundamentally the reason to work is still the same: to meet our basic needs. To this end, I would propose that our education might be focused on giving our students the skills they need to be able to ‘work’ in today’s society. But this raises the question: Do we work to live or do we live to work? Is it the responsibility of our education system to give our students the means to ‘live’ (i.e., the active sense of living – what we ‘need to become’)?

I would speculate that our education ‘system’ has focused on producing workers instead of fostering an environment that would provide the resources to help our students obtain what they ‘need to become’ in part due to a perception of inherent weaknesses of the welfare argument - grossly stated: each individual should have the right to advance their own welfare. The counter argument is that we cannot create programs with an aim to satisfy people’s individual ‘needs’ (i.e., welfare) because those needs can vary too dramatically and this can lead to a tragedy of the commons. Instead, our education ‘system’ proposes we accept a rationing principle that is based on achieving some universal degree of equality in our society for our students. However, now we need to define what is ‘some degree of equality’ in order to know if our education ‘system’ is achieving this purpose. This is a question I think can be addressed another day.

If we work to live and living entails more than work (i.e., the need to become), taking into consideration that people’s needs are different, are we willing to agree that the most common need amongst humans is choice: the ability to choose between various course of actions of our own creation or those of others and the ability to not choose any? Are we also willing to accept that the tool that we all need to develop (students and community members alike) in order to satisfy our ‘need to become’ is the ability to think critically? The ability to choose the correct action for ourselves requires the ability to think critically, that is, the ability to be able to weigh the merits of the various options presented to us or that we create and the ability to be able to postpone gratification in order to accomplish long term personal goals. If the ability to think ‘critically’ provides all of us with some degree of equality, is this, then, not the purpose of our education system?

If this is the purpose of our education system then the question is: Does our education system produce critical thinkers? Are the two (worker and critical thinker) not compatible?

Reply to This

Reply to This

RSS

About

Video Interviews!

TVO recorded great interviews / discussions at our conference!

Watch them now, or share them at your next school council meeting!!!!

Presentations and notes from all sessions are being posted to our main website, as we receive them.

Interviews with:
Minister of Education
Annie Kidder
Charles Pascal (Early Learning)
Testing the Pros and the Cons (Panel Discussion)


Book Chat

Add your book chat here by emailing:
jan@peopleforeducation.com


October 4, 2009
Not so long ago I chanced upon a tv interview with Sarah Vowell. She was talking about her new book The Wordy Shipmates and she was funny and intriguing enough that I picked up the book. Not only has she written a number of books, she is also the voice of Violet in the animated film The Incredibles and contributes regularly to the This American Life on Chicago Public Radio
Although I was reading for amusement, information and stories, once again I bumped into education!
The Wordy Shipmates is about the Puritans in the 17 century and Sarah Vowell's childhood in the 20th century and life now in the 21st. The book is a delightful flow of ideas and customs that weave through the narrative of American life. Education was there at the beginning
...Continue....
Join the conversation at Book Chat

Latest Activity

Glen Brown Will have to listen to the conference podcasts...
4 hours ago
Glen Brown updated their profile
4 hours ago
Glen Brown updated their profile photo
4 hours ago
Help us to design a broader vision for education in the 21st century!
6 hours ago
I apologize. I am eager to read other people's contributions but Sheila's question really got me thinking and I wanted to share my thoughts. I think that Sam’s blog – “the Purpose of Education – Revised” is a valuable contribution to this discuss...
yesterday
It appears I will have to say something about my editorial decisions, though it takes away from the flow of thought about which I will now write. I have wrestled with the whole idea of censorship and freedom of expression, but I have come to the r...
on Saturday
I really like what you have shared here, Anthony. I am going to mull this over some more, and as you have said/suggested, our education system is focused on producing workers. So for now, I would like to put the question "out there", why might the...
on Saturday
on Saturday
Keeth Kumarasamy updated their profile photo
on Saturday
Hi Sam and all, I wanted to come back and read all the posts today, as I was struck by a poster in the subway (which Sheila mentioned was coming) from Lakehead University in Thunder Bay. I really like your thesis, or whatever you would call it Sam...
on Friday
on Friday
on Friday
Thank you for your feedback and link with great info Annie! Our school board has already implemented many different clubs, including homework, cubs etc. into our schools in the hopes of having community hubs as it were. I believe this to be succe...
on Friday
Hi Kevin, This is a great question, and I look forward to hearing what other people have to say. Our research seems to indicate that it varies from school to school and board to board as to how fundraised money is handled. Since 2005, all fundrais...
on Friday
on Friday
A blog post by Sam was featured
“Institutions become dysfunctional when they do not accomplish the purposes for which they were created. Schools were created to be places of true learning, places where the true natures of children would be allowed to grow and flourish. By this d...
on Friday
I'm gonna jump in here with a bit more clarification, because the questions Kevin asked are ones that I get asked all the time as the Parent Support Coordinator here at People for Education. There are three main sources of funding for parent enga...
on Thursday
Hi Deborah, I am new to this venue of discourse so forgive me if I am stating nothing new. My background is philosophy (ethics) and political theory. I am unfamiliar with Paolo Freire but now intend to read his book. The issue that stood out for ...
on Thursday
My view as a PIC chair is there are 2 bread and butter funding sources for parent involvement at the school level. The $500 and the pro-grants. Different PIC's have different ways of communicating with Parents/school councils- some directly throug...
on Thursday
Thanks for helping clear that up, Gord. Busy discussion here! Gord, you have touched on something that I have been concerned with, and might be more so ahead in time. Just as "school councils" sometimes get the blame for things--when it is said no...
on Thursday

Badge

Loading…

© 2009   Created by People for Education on Ning.   Create Your Own Social Network

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service